Upchuck has no say in the judiciary of Britain, Australia or America. That is firmly under the control of the Temple B.A.R., conveniently situated in the independent City of London.
It is the power of Roman law which holds Assange in prison.
We hear a lot about the 'Rule of Law', don't we? But who actually knows what that phrase really means?
I attempted to unravel it and came across an alarming extract from a book which throws light on where the buck really stops.
"We have no choice but to unite all 5 Eyes nations to DEMAND an end to the independence of the corporate Crown, the City of London, its Temple B.A.R. (British Accreditation Registry) and consequent parasitic corporate empire which destroys lives globally and gives the British people a very bad reputation by blatantly stealing our country, misusing our name and inciting hatred against us worldwide."
masses ignored the torture of an unconvicted innocent peoples champion, while far lesser men become insanely rich and are voted in rigged elections, luciferians that steal, destroy and murder roam the streets
Other great men like John McAfee have murdered in cold blood, without justice, for opposing these NWO satanists and the despotist agenda.
May God hear our hearts and prayers, and set this man free.
Assange has been an intelligence asset since 1991 when he was convicted of causing $100K of damage by hacking into Nortel. He was told he was looking at at least 10 years in jail. He was set free with a small fine.
It is a given that any leader of the West will be well versed in the Book of Corruption, the Book of Deception, but let's not blame it on Mao, or anyone else: we are the bad example in our portion of history, and that's all we are responsible for. "Christendom" is in some contexts, even Christian contexts, pejorative: it represents the letter of the law or the manipulation, distortion of concepts and labels in order to confuse what is wrong or bad with what is right or good. It is the appearance or hi-jacking of good in the interests of evil, and therefore the worse possible kind of theft.
I wouldn't say Charles is a usurper. Parliament can appoint anyone it chooses to be the lawful monarch. They have so appointed Charles. There is no doubt that Charles does not have the strongest genetic claim to the throne. There are countless people in the UK who are of more direct genetic descent from Brutus of Troy, for example; but Charles has the right to the throne because parliament gave it to him, just like parliament decided to behead Charles I, and to invite The Elector of Hanover to become George I and so on, and so on. Who will be the lawful monarch is not decided by blood alone.
Wow! Jim, you put out a lot to digest. And you do it with such conviction. I've been in a decluttering of the mind, while seeking serenity, bracing for impact stage of my life. Your clarity and conciseness are welcome. I accidently muted and don't know how to unmute when I liked your writing. A shameless act of self promotion, I suppose, to get other stuff near the top. Other stuff pertinent to my story for a possibility I have only just considered. Forgive me.
The convoluted wording of legalisms grew up around the necessity to hide from ourselves the violence we intend toward each other. Between depriving a man of one hour from his life and depriving him of his life there exists only a difference of degree. You have done violence to him, consumed his energy. Elaborate euphemisms may conceal your intent to kill, but behind any use of power over another the ultimate assumption remains: “I feed on your energy.”
Dune Messiah, Frank Herbert
I don’t see how one could want to free one and then imprison another.
If someone cannot be trusted to be a part of society we should do what is neceſsary; therefore, good.
Either we expel them or we end their life. It is a cruel and vampiric behavior to imprison anyone.
Upchuck has no say in the judiciary of Britain, Australia or America. That is firmly under the control of the Temple B.A.R., conveniently situated in the independent City of London.
It is the power of Roman law which holds Assange in prison.
We hear a lot about the 'Rule of Law', don't we? But who actually knows what that phrase really means?
I attempted to unravel it and came across an alarming extract from a book which throws light on where the buck really stops.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean
I concluded that a Roman Empire Mk 2 rules the world via its grip on 5 slave colonies and I explained how that operates here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/five-slave-nations
The final paragraph of which is:
"We have no choice but to unite all 5 Eyes nations to DEMAND an end to the independence of the corporate Crown, the City of London, its Temple B.A.R. (British Accreditation Registry) and consequent parasitic corporate empire which destroys lives globally and gives the British people a very bad reputation by blatantly stealing our country, misusing our name and inciting hatred against us worldwide."
Hope that helps to shine a light on the exit.
Amen. How long, Oh lord ......
Free Julian Assange!
Far to long have the complacent
masses ignored the torture of an unconvicted innocent peoples champion, while far lesser men become insanely rich and are voted in rigged elections, luciferians that steal, destroy and murder roam the streets
Other great men like John McAfee have murdered in cold blood, without justice, for opposing these NWO satanists and the despotist agenda.
May God hear our hearts and prayers, and set this man free.
Justice for All.
Amen.
Time to free truth tellers so we can get back to enjoying our free country.
God wants our attention! I concur. We must acknowledge GOD, and we must pray... "The Way of the Cross leads Home."
I no longer trust Stella, formerly Sara Gonzalez Devant, or much about this awful spectacle.
God bless Julian :-(
Assange has been an intelligence asset since 1991 when he was convicted of causing $100K of damage by hacking into Nortel. He was told he was looking at at least 10 years in jail. He was set free with a small fine.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/06/07/no-secrets
COME TOGETHER, RIGHT NOW!
https://youtu.be/J9xR4F864sc?si=-SBLIgQp8JITcg-v
It is a given that any leader of the West will be well versed in the Book of Corruption, the Book of Deception, but let's not blame it on Mao, or anyone else: we are the bad example in our portion of history, and that's all we are responsible for. "Christendom" is in some contexts, even Christian contexts, pejorative: it represents the letter of the law or the manipulation, distortion of concepts and labels in order to confuse what is wrong or bad with what is right or good. It is the appearance or hi-jacking of good in the interests of evil, and therefore the worse possible kind of theft.
I wouldn't say Charles is a usurper. Parliament can appoint anyone it chooses to be the lawful monarch. They have so appointed Charles. There is no doubt that Charles does not have the strongest genetic claim to the throne. There are countless people in the UK who are of more direct genetic descent from Brutus of Troy, for example; but Charles has the right to the throne because parliament gave it to him, just like parliament decided to behead Charles I, and to invite The Elector of Hanover to become George I and so on, and so on. Who will be the lawful monarch is not decided by blood alone.
Wow! Jim, you put out a lot to digest. And you do it with such conviction. I've been in a decluttering of the mind, while seeking serenity, bracing for impact stage of my life. Your clarity and conciseness are welcome. I accidently muted and don't know how to unmute when I liked your writing. A shameless act of self promotion, I suppose, to get other stuff near the top. Other stuff pertinent to my story for a possibility I have only just considered. Forgive me.
The convoluted wording of legalisms grew up around the necessity to hide from ourselves the violence we intend toward each other. Between depriving a man of one hour from his life and depriving him of his life there exists only a difference of degree. You have done violence to him, consumed his energy. Elaborate euphemisms may conceal your intent to kill, but behind any use of power over another the ultimate assumption remains: “I feed on your energy.”
Dune Messiah, Frank Herbert
I don’t see how one could want to free one and then imprison another.
If someone cannot be trusted to be a part of society we should do what is neceſsary; therefore, good.
Either we expel them or we end their life. It is a cruel and vampiric behavior to imprison anyone.