11 Comments

Many thanks for the endorsement! I refer to the mElon as Lone Skum, a simple but effective anagram of his name. Mind you, I don't think of him as anything more than a front man or fall guy for the Black Nobs, who tell him what to do on their behalf.

Basically, if he apparently 'owns' anything, it is theirs..... lock stock and stinking barrel. Same could be said for Besos, Zuckerberg, Gates and Soros. All are temporary dark knights of the Templar variety with no more security of tenure than their crusading predecessors. Apparently at the top of their potential, but in reality as dispensable as teenage office tea-boys.

Expand full comment
author

You're welcome Frances. God bless you and your family with abundant blessings. Amen.

That's a great anagram! It would never have occurred to me. Though I did run across the "Elon Muskox" topiary pix, quite droll. He does seem to be subordinate, as you say.

Expand full comment

Well that was a mini novel! I tried to take the Libertarian test but the link went to the results page and I couldn't find the test. But I have taken many of them and come out either pure Libertarian or slightly right Libertarian. Anyway, I agree with you about mElon. 🤣Good name. Lost 2 accounts at Twitter and never got them back. On my 3rd one now...

Expand full comment
author

When I go here: http://www.bcaplan.com/cgi-bin/purity.cgi it brings me to the test. At the bottom there is a link for scoring the test. However, it may act differently depending on what browser you are using and things like settings. Thank you for your kind words and for reading my stuff. God bless you. One day in a free country. God's will be done, amen.

Expand full comment

Just curious and you don't have to answer but how do you live? No income, no house, no car, no savings, no govt subsidies...

Expand full comment
author
Nov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023Author

Mostly by breathing in and out. 😎 I eat twice a day and sleep with an indirect light on in accord with the rule of Benedict. One could say that I live an hermitical life at this point, or "like a paladin."

My friend Peter Zipper used to speak quite regularly at events like the New Orleans gold bug conference. He would say in his annual speech there that Americans talk too much about their finances. Americans will tell you the amount they paid for a house, the terms of their mortgage, the name of their liability insurance provider, and go into great detail about how much they make and spend. In comparison, he would say, Austrians talk about pastry.

There are things that are not "income" as it is defined in the relevant laws. For example, the expenditure of the principal of a loan is a source of money but is not income per se. Similarly, to receive back the principal funds lent out is not income, but the restoration of an asset. Expense reimbursements are not income. Customer cash advances are not income to a business. The expenditure of an existing asset is not income, but spending. These are examples.

I'm the managing principal of a company, Eldar Capital, that offers services in private equity, business development, and marketing. I'm the author of five books nobody buys including The Atlantis Papers, Being Sovereign, Being Libertarian, Space Scouts Field Manual Parody, and the novel Freedom Decentral: Free the Slaves. I am the publisher of After Dark Publications which published the 12th book of Courtney Smith and currently is seeking to publish "The Free World Project" by Christopher Boehr who has been tedious about not completing his manuscript since I told him he had to publish his ideas in 2018. Neither Eldar nor After Dark has any employees, nor do they pay me anything. But they do have tax loss carry forwards, so there's that.

Expand full comment

Thanks for answering. My family never talks about money in the way others do. I was taught that money matters are private. Must be part Austrian. ( actually I'm 35% Scottish-Irish, 25% British, 29% Swedish, and 10 percent Iberian Penninsula and East European, so maybe that's Austrian.) 😂 I'm glad you are able to do what you do without showing income in the tax code way of doing things. Like you, I hate taxes. Philiosophically and practically both. 😊

Expand full comment

Okay this time it worked. I got 137 and it said this: You are nearly a perfect libertarian, with a tiny number of blind spots. Think about them, then take the test over again. On the other hand, if you scored this high, you probably have a good libertarian objection to my suggested libertarian answer. :-)

Expand full comment

Good day Jim,

Thanks for your comments about the Enigmatic Elon. I have read that his mother is a Satanist.

A few comments on the beginning paragraphs of your long essay:

FYI, "Pennsylvania University" is the "University of Pennsylvania".

"Scientistic" - good expression. I have used it for years because it encapsulates in one word the meanings of pseudoscientific and and an -ism. Scientism is another.

vaxxajabs - I looked up about a dozen medical instituions and their definition of vaccine. By definition, it must

1. decrease transmittance

2. increase immunity

Over a time period of more than 6 month to a year, it does neither. It immediately increases transmittance.

Therefore, I do not refer to the mRNA drugs as vaccines since they aren't but as vexxines. If this neologism goes viral it will cause the popular chatter to be given pause for a moment.

"arch-enemy of traditional Catholics “pope” Francis" - the first Jesuit to become el Papa. (In Spanish, la papa is "the potato".) The SoJ has finally achieved its goal of taking over the Vatican. This does not leave as much for the Superior General to do that the Pope cannot.

bad translators - there is much in scripture that is poorly, incorrectly, or questionably translated into English. I could go on an on about this, starting with the words translated "God".

It is not that the translators are sinister. The hieroglyphic translation scene in Stargate illustrates the problem. The right sense of expressions is not easy to determine.

" the freemasons and other Gnostic heretics financed Karl Marx" - The French Oriental Lodge of Freemasonry was the destination of a courier from ex?-Jesuit Adam Weishaupt of the U. of Ingolstaadt in Bavaria. Lightning struck the courier and the govt of Baden-Wuertemberg recovered the papers and immediately outlawed Weishaupt's Illuminati, founded in 1776. The 10 planks of the Illuminati are indistiguisahable from the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto. Go figure. Source: Rulers of Evil, F. Tupper Saussy

Expand full comment
author

Are you familiar with the theatrical colloquialism to refer to the play by Shakespeare with the name "MacBeth" in the title as "the Scottish play"? In my time at Columbia, I also visited Dartmouth, Yale, and Harvard. Amongst the ivy league in my day we referred to the place as "the Pennsylvania University." You can call it whatever tf you wish.

You might find interesting both the scientism of Hans Reichenbach (see his book on The Scientific Philosophy) and Arthur Koestler's account of a meeting he had with Reichenbach regarding the Rhine cards.

Vexxines is amusing. It has the XX in it, which I think is an indication that something is not only unworthy but also somewhat obscene. Nevertheless, I'll stick with vaxxajabs, kthxbye

There is considerable controversy about the election of Pope John 23rd and even more controversy over the "election" of Bergoglio who calls himself Francis. I'm increasingly distant from the current discussions amongst traditional Catholics about matters reflecting badly upon Francis, but I am aware that there are many. You might look for "Return to Tradition" and the excellent Dr. Anthony Stine for YouTube videos and a web site devoted to the topics.

I was aware of the connexion betwixt the freemasons and Marx. You see portrait photos of Marx hiding his hand quite often. There is no question that he was not only a freemason, but that he was paid by them to write his filth. I believe the same is true of Rousseau. I've not spent much time tracing them further back into the past, though, as there is yet much to do.

Expand full comment
deletedNov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

I don't wish to discourage anyone from viewing the posts by various authors and celebrities who are on Twitter/X. Author Rudy Havenstein has a 'stack and is also on Twitter. Rudy said recently, "I never say X." Rudy's 'stack is https://rudy.substack.com/ and he has a similar profile username on Twitter which was a deleted profile under Parag Agrawal and was restored under the new management of the mElon.

Twitter is now found at X.com and I believe you can visit profile pages without ever logging in, including that of Tucker Carlson, and even use the web site version of "X" to view Tucker's interviews. I tend, instead, to go to ZeroHedge.com and read threads that are posted there. Facebook also allows page visits to their web site without logging in. Both Twitter/X and Facebook are tedious about wanting you to log in, though. And I think the Microsoft-acquired LinkedIn is much more tedious still. your mileage may vary

Yes, I do believe that there are people who are so afraid of freedom that they don't want to allow others to have any of it. In the fullness of time, they always lose. Mohandas Gandhi said that about tyrants, you know. They always lose. Think of it. Always. They do great harm, hurt many people, but they cannot keep power. They aren't in control. God is. God's will be done. Amen.

Expand full comment